They title it “Baby and the Bathwater,” Jeff Swain and Brian Young.
Full podcast available from ITunes :EdTech episode #4_ Baby & the bath water
These snippets of their conversation stuck out to me.
“If we implement it as we did in the past, if we support it as we did in the past, we will end up with what we had in the past.” (Brian’s voice I think)
The LMS’s of today pretty much all have the same functionality. In what way are they flawed? What is it about an LMS as a tool that still needs to change… is it
– the workflow required of an Instructor to accomplish a pedagogical goal?
– the fact that it’s a closed system which doesn’t allow for students to interact with other students studying the same same?
– flexibility to make some parts open and others closed to the students taking it that term (in that particular section, or all sections taught by same Instructor? Or all sections across several Instructors?)
They love blogs (sounds like for teaching, research, and reflection method).
How does an LMS related to the ground swell of Program Assessment? LMS repositories aren’t built for providing artifacts and data for assessing the program… But why not?
What about from the student point of view? Why don’t we map out their entire program so that over time they can see how each course supports the program’s goals, how far they’ve come? How far yet to go?
“100% of the issues with any of the LMSs are due to lack of planning on the Instructor’s part.” (around 26 minutes) – Brian Young