<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About Laura Gekeler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lauragekeler.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lauragekeler.com</link>
	<description>Learning With You</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:35:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LG</title>
		<link>http://lauragekeler.com/about/#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 13:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jerry, Maybe neither one of us is &quot;in&quot; the neo-orthodox camp as much as we&#039;d like to be. Upon review, it looks like I&#039;m sure not. Your comment made me review whether I would like to join others so labeled and the answer is &quot;no&quot; I would not. 
I&#039;d like to make my own &#039;camp&#039; which is almost orthodox (&quot;neo&quot; or near) and almost &quot;neo,&quot; that is, subjective enough to believe the Holy Spirit still moves and changes things today, but not subjective enough to say the Bible &lt;i&gt;becomes&lt;/i&gt; the Word of God when it speaks truth to me. (See http://apprising.org/2009/03/28/neo-orthodox-approach-to-the-bible-perfect-fit-for-emergence-christianity/ for criticism of neo-orthodoxy defined for today).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry, Maybe neither one of us is &#8220;in&#8221; the neo-orthodox camp as much as we&#8217;d like to be. Upon review, it looks like I&#8217;m sure not. Your comment made me review whether I would like to join others so labeled and the answer is &#8220;no&#8221; I would not.<br />
I&#8217;d like to make my own &#8216;camp&#8217; which is almost orthodox (&#8220;neo&#8221; or near) and almost &#8220;neo,&#8221; that is, subjective enough to believe the Holy Spirit still moves and changes things today, but not subjective enough to say the Bible <i>becomes</i> the Word of God when it speaks truth to me. (See <a href="http://apprising.org/2009/03/28/neo-orthodox-approach-to-the-bible-perfect-fit-for-emergence-christianity/" rel="nofollow">http://apprising.org/2009/03/28/neo-orthodox-approach-to-the-bible-perfect-fit-for-emergence-christianity/</a> for criticism of neo-orthodoxy defined for today).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Bishop</title>
		<link>http://lauragekeler.com/about/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Bishop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 03:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Laura - Great bio. So I obsess and being intrigued by whether or not I too am of the Neo-Orthodoxy persuasion off to Wikipedia where I find &quot;Neo-orthodoxy, in Europe also known as theology of crisis and dialectical theology&quot;. This is fantastic - theology of crisis. Yup I&#039;m in.
Thx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura &#8211; Great bio. So I obsess and being intrigued by whether or not I too am of the Neo-Orthodoxy persuasion off to Wikipedia where I find &#8220;Neo-orthodoxy, in Europe also known as theology of crisis and dialectical theology&#8221;. This is fantastic &#8211; theology of crisis. Yup I&#8217;m in.<br />
Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

